Endocrinology
A CGM report is a start.
Your interpretation matters.
Inspect the report, relevant context, and proposed follow-up together. Define the clinical review boundary before an evaluation.
Source report
The clinician checks the reporting period, available device data, and clinical question before considering an interpretation.
CGM report · Source checked
Relevant context
Relevant history and the circumstances around the readings sit beside the same CGM report. The clinician checks the context against its sources.
CGM report · Context alongside
Proposed interpretation
The clinician compares a proposed interpretation with the same CGM report, distinguishing source observations from suggested follow-up.
CGM report · Proposal for review
Physician review
The physician resolves discrepancies in the same CGM report and proposed interpretation, then chooses the next action. Clinical outputs require clinician review before use or signing.
CGM report · Physician decides
Source inspection
Check the interval,
not just the summary.
In Thyra’s published synthetic pre-visit example, the follow-up commitment says 3 months and the draft says 6 weeks. That disagreement needs physician resolution.
View the published source →A synthetic example illustrates a review question. It is not a patient-specific recommendation.
A practical next step
Discuss your CGM review workflow.
Tell Dr. Nya Ngatchou about your specialty, current tools, and the work you want to evaluate.